As with the majority of my fellow Christian bloggers, I am going to write something about Good Friday. There are many things I could (and may) write about, however there is one thing that has bugged me about the Crucifixion story. Steve Bates pointed it out in his last post:
“He became the embodiment of sin; God himself turned away, leading to those impassioned words, eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani. I think this must have been far more painful than any beating he took that day.”
I added the emphasis on the “eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani” part myself because this is what I have a problem understanding for years. Now, disclaimers. This is not a silly attack on what Steve Bates has said. I have a lot of respect for Steve and I only use his quote because it captures everything I wanted to talk about really well. I could also get into the sticky area of doctrine here but I don’t want to. I don’t have a problem with Jesus dieing on the cross. There had to be a sacrifice and sin had to be dealt with. I’m not wanting to go down that road.
The road I want to go down is this odd Hebrew phrase “eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani” which, when translated, means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” For a while I didn’t understand this and it seemed very odd that God would turn away from something that he set up. A lack of commitment because it got to hard, like he couldn’t see it through. Also, if God turned away because there was ‘too much sin’ on Jesus, how much sin would it take for God to turn away from us? Is this right? I always saw it as God giving Jesus a raw deal. We could get into the nature of the Trinity hear and maybe that may help this understanding. But I don’t think God did ‘forsake’ Jesus. Let me try and explain why I think this.
God loves us and is love. He has said that “Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you.” I may be taking this way out of context and please say if I am. But doesn’t seem there is a bit of a contradiction here? God promises that he will leave forsake us, and yet not only does he forsake someone, he forsakes his own son! There has been a lot of talk over the past couple years of Cosmic Child Abuse, and I am not claiming that. I’m just pointing out that this idea that God turned his back on Jesus at the cross doesn’t add up.
Maybe I don’t fully understand what is going on here but someone explained something to me which helped a lot when wrestling with this. Our troubling phrase “eloi, eloi…” is only found in Matthew and Marks gospel. This is not surprising that its in both, as Matthew uses a lot of Marks gospel as its base. Matthew, however, was written primarily for the Jewish community. The Jews at the time would of recorgnised our phrase. They don’t have the nice Chapter and Verses and paragraph headings in their scriptures as we commonly do. So instead, particularly with Psalms, they would use the first line to identify parts of the scriptures. This may or may not be a coincidence, but “Eloi, eloi…” is actually the first line of Psalm 22. Give Psalm 22 a quick read and you may also find some interesting things in there. Here are a few:
Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones; people stare and gloat over me. They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing. But you, O LORD, be not far off; O my Strength, come quickly to help me.
Psalm 22:16-19
Now this sheds a very different light on the situation. Is Jesus reminding us what is actually going on rather than a cry of anguish? Is it actually a victory cry of what is being fulfilled? Is it a cry for help and has God, instead of turning his back on Jesus, answering Jesus’ cry and got his arms wrapped tight around him whispering “I’m not far off, my strength is here, come on Son.”?
I pray you have a good Good Friday as we remember what Jesus did on the cross. Remember though… its not over yet…
